Thursday, December 30, 2010

...the beginning...

What, then, was in the beginning???
A Bang?
A void or a vacuum?
A Word?
A Creator?

Like the ancients said, chaos!
The space within the great yawning, gaping mouth of the creator
at the apex of inhaling just two moments before the word was spoken
that hurled forth creation.
And in the moment before,
when the exhaling breath of God rushed forth into the void,
chasing away the vacuum as the heat and moisture, the substance,
the divine phlegm, fills up the space!
The first moment, then, as the first word was spoken and time began,
the clock began
(though faster for us holding still and slower for us moving quickly!),
and a sound like a shock wave set all matter a-thrummin'
as the very sinew of the smallest subatomic particles began to vibrate,
each settling into its own rhythm that makes it all distinctive.
And then the collisions began!
As the atoms clump and cluster and the matter bumps and sticks
and from gases clumping come clouds
and even the clouds began igniting and burned
as new elements formed from the flame, and
new clumps grew
and were slung about the flaming massive centers
of each spinning gravitational top
all dancing and spinning like some mad ball at the creation of the cosmos.

Then cooling clumps of material
and the very ground we walk on
and the cooling gases settled in the low places, very deep.

And the condensation formed above
and the basic building blocks were there
to develop, evolve, resolve into (after some time had passed)
a walking-talking-thinking-thing which was because it thought.

Does it matter how it came to be or only that it is?
Was it like a ball of clay from which the shape was carefully formed?
Or perhaps a ball of matter (all matter) vibrating with the force
of all creations' potential energy waiting to unfurl?

Perhaps merely the wave of a divine magic wand, but that lacks creativity.
And surely a creator
of the sun and moon and earth and stars and all plants and animals and fish in the sea
is more creative than that.

And in the very words
the vibration of creation and
the process of a million years
to enjoy the development of a universe,
so mysterious in its form and all its workings.        

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

A reluctant Michigander

I am not a Michigander by birth or by choice.  I am a transplant, in much the same way a whirley tree-seed is lifted by the wind and deposited, and there it lays its roots without any say as to its location.  So too, here I have been deposited and my gnarly roots have stretched and now stubbornly hold tight to any number of unseen fast-holds.  I could be pulled up and moved across the way – but first I would have to disentangle myself from Michigan.

I am a transplanted southerner, in the long tradition of transplanted southerners, carried north by opportunity, though not my opportunity, but my father’s.  I am a Louisianan by birth, but my family spent the first few years bouncing back and forth between Louisiana, Pennsylvania and Michigan.  Preschool, kindergarten and first grade were spent up north.  However, those years, and especially the years preceding them, remind me of a flash-back-memory-scene from so many movies.  The type of scene illustrated by photographs, or even better, silent home movies flashing images of family and play and holidays.  All snippets, with a narrative told over the arc of the montage.  Visions of a past life that slowly slip away.  I don’t remember the connecting parts of those memories, the sinew and muscle of the scenes, just the highlights that create more of an atmosphere than a comprehensive tale.

Of Gettysburg I have many fond, but scattered memories.  Perhaps it is because that was the age of discovery.  I was a preschooler and first encountering many things beyond the walls of home.  Everything seemed new and exciting.  Old churches, battlefields, girls, older kids...

Of Louisiana, I had the first feelings of independence and self identity.  I walked to school, independent of parents.  I could go where I wanted (okay, I always went to school).  I rode my bike far and wide: from the movie theater down the street to see the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, to my friends house a block over, to the Mississippi River a few blocks away.

But of Michigan (after we moved back when I was in fourth grade) the memories that stick out the most are only negative memories of the place (even despite good memories of a good many people).  Being moved away from a good friend down south.  The bitter cold of Michigan winter (compared with mild Louisiana winter – I never got into winter sports, and as a result I was a couch potato most of the frigid, frigid year).  The rough transition of being a new kid.  The awkwardness of middle school.  It was not till high school that I started to feel comfortable in my own skin in a social setting.  By that point, I had nothing but negative feelings about the state.  I admit that they were not rational, but they were firmly entrenched. 

And I kept finding more reasons to dislike living in the state.  I still hated the cold.  I watched too much local news and it made me hate Detroit (I realize now the problem with local news sensationalism).  I did not like living in the suburbs (still true).  I became a teenager, and therefore I did not like living with my family.  And my family lived in Michigan, so…

Then I went to college in Kalamazoo.  I really liked Kalamazoo.  So I made an exception for Kalamazoo and the surrounding environs (later I went to Lake Michigan and later still, Mackinac, and I made exceptions for those places too).

I graduated and moved back to Southeast Michigan.  I still did not like living in the Suburbs, but living near family had its advantages.  Plus, now I was living on my own–-out from under my parent’s roof.  But then I was trying to find a job, and since Michigan was the only state--not hit by a hurricane--to be in a recession in 2005, then I had that to dislike about Michigan!  And still I wanted to move!  And my illogical, passionate disdain for Michigan burned still deep inside me. 

But then we bought a condo (why?), and had another child (oh yeah), and now they are in school and I now I am in school and all my family’s here (after-all), and I do have a job, and we are never gonna be able to sell our condo in this economy... 

...and though I may be a transplanted Southerner, I have been gone nigh-on twenty years and would not likely feel at home in the south anyway.  And though Michigan has not grown on me, I once realized that I have grown in Michigan for nigh-on twenty years.  And so I have become a reluctant Michigander. 

Thursday, December 23, 2010

A Holiday Message from Mike: Why I’m Not an Atheist

I read a fantastic blog by comedic genius Ricky Gervais about why he is an Atheist (I suggest you read it too to make your own conclusions).  I say fantastic not because I agree with his conclusions, for I am not an Atheist, but because I understand where he is coming from.  Not only can I entirely appreciate why he is an atheist, but I think he raises an important question that any Christian should not be afraid of, but embrace:  Why do you believe in God?


Read more »

Friday, November 26, 2010

Thankful

I was reminded of something I was thankful for when showing my 10th graders the Charlie Brown Thanksgiving Special the day before Thanksgiving. It was a last minute substitution for my planned lesson for the day, and it was well received by the kids.  Early in the day, one of my students said, "you do kinda look like Charlie Brown, though."
I was not offended, in fact I appreciated the comparison, because it reminded me of my 8th grade English teacher. This teacher was one of the few that I have fond memories of from middle school. Two things stand out in my memory about him. First, he called me Charlie Brown. Now some might interpret that as an insult, since Chuck does not possess the traits that are often prized in our society. He is not assertive, confident, or overly optimistic. But he is loyal and hopeful and at that point in my life, I identified with him. I think I also identified with the fact that he always felt a little misunderstood by his peers. Further, my teacher used this nickname in the spirit of "you're a good man, Charlie Brown" rather than "you blockhead!"  I think his use of this nickname made me feel like he understood me. I was insecure and not very outgoing. I just tried to blend into my desk and get by. Middle school was not always a good time for me, like many people, and I often felt like teachers did not really care. I was not a trouble maker and therefore I did not get much attention.
This teacher, however, did notice me. Apparently I was in the remedial English class at the start of my eighth grade year and he approached me a couple of weeks into the school year and told me that he
thought I should not be in the remedial class. He had my schedule changed, encouraged me to catch up with the work I had missed, and continued to encourage me throughout the year.
So on Thanksgiving, I was feeling thankful for those who have encouraged me at rough times in my life.
As a teacher today, if I do nothing else right, I try to be an encouraging teacher. I try to pay attention to the good kids and the quiet kids, and not just spend all hour riding the trouble makers. And I was happy to be reminded about this teacher who gave me encouragement and individual recognition during a time when I felt invisible.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Corporate Church of America

I hate church politics- that's why I stopped attending an institutional church.  The church leadership can elbow out a pastor because it's a good business decision.  Doesn't sound like the body of Christ (corpus Christi).  More like corporate lutheran church of America.  But that's what happens when the church is run like a business.  No thanks.  I'll take ecclesia.

Monday, June 21, 2010

On becoming a father, and then learning not to take it for granted.

Molly’s first two babies were not born in the stereotypically normal style. I say “first two” not because she has had any more, but as long as you are alive, it is still possible! I use the word “normal” to mean like in the movies. Expectant mom calls expectant dad and says “it’s time!” Dad breaks the speed limit to get mom to the hospital on time and there is focused breathing and huffing and morphine and a baby.
Sylvie Morton enjoyed her mother’s womb so much that she refused to leave. Much as her personality would later prove, she began life with a very strong will. Why leave the womb when it was so comfortable? She had shelter and sustenance.
We drove in a very surreal, non-hurried manner to the hospital. We casually walked up to the desk and announced our names much as we would have done at a restaurant – “2 please, no smoking, oh, and one infant…no, she is coming later.” We settled in for the night, the doctor gave Molly the labor inducing drug and we all assumed we would begin the delivery in the morning. Sylvie- a name she would receive only after Molly and I saw her ex-eutero and cleaned off- decided that she would come out now.
The contractions came too quickly and too sharply for Molly to handle. By the time the sun came up our angel of a nurse, with the comfort of a mother, said: “Why don’t I get you some morphine dear?”
An affirmative whimper and a few minutes later Molly was in a pleasant, morphine induced state. Before receiving the dose, the angel nurse had moved Molly to a rocker. When the contractions would come, morphine-Molly would begin to rock the rocking chair, eyes closed with an occasional moan or whimper, until the contraction had passed. Then, the rocker would come to a rest, briefly. Sylvie arrived and changed our lives, and most immediately, our schedules. We learned how little sleep you could function off of.
Aine Morton was not supposed to live. In fact, at the time that we were told that our second child would probably be dead within twenty four hours, we did not yet know that she was a she at all because she was still in her mother’s womb, only half way to her due date. Without amniotic fluid a baby’s lungs cannot develop and she would be born without the ability to breath. Since my wife had lost all of the amniotic fluid that was supposed to keep little Aine safe, Molly had been told by her doctor to come to the hospital immediately to end the pregnancy- for it had been too early for Aine to have had the ability to survive outside of the womb, even with the most modern of medical technology. Not only was Aine supposed to die, but if the womb became infected, Molly could die too.
I was called at work and rushed the 39 miles to meet my wife at the hospital. I was on the phone with my dad in the car and he was trying to prepare me for what I was going to face. He had counseled women before, dealing with the grief of a lost newborn and he told me that we should name the child and hold it and say goodbye. It would help with the grieving process. And I was mentally preparing myself for that-preparing for the possibility that I would watch my wife have to give birth to a dead or dying baby: our baby. And I was crying, driving on the freeway, thinking about the life and death of one so small, and yet so important to me; someone I did not know, but was flesh of my flesh; someone I was about to lose before having the opportunity to meet.
I pulled into the parking lot, composed myself and walked in to the Mother-Baby unit. It was much different than last time. With Sylvie, it was so calm, collected and scheduled. We waited our turn and calmly went back to a room and Molly calmly got ready to deliver a baby. This time, I rushed in, was buzzed back immediately and rushed through a different door, down a different hall. This was not the hall for scheduled babies. This was not the hall for normal babies. This was the other hall. I walked into the room, labeled “Antepartum Room three”, not sure what to expect.
We were told by a very solemn doctor- a father himself who could not imagine having to contemplate the scenario now before these young parents- that Aine would not live without the fluid. There was a chance it could re-accumulate, he said, since the body can produce more of the fluid, but the chance that there would be enough was very small: maybe one in five. They would do nothing that night, and would do another ultrasound the next day, just to check. They would schedule an induction for later that day and Molly would go into labor to deliver a baby, probably still no more than one pound in weight, who would die during the premature labor, or shortly thereafter from the inability to breath. Both parents slept that night, perhaps only able to do so from exhaustion and the sense that it was already decided.
But the next day, there was more fluid. Not much, but enough to “wait and see.” By the next day there was more fluid still, and so began over a month of “waiting to see”. They tried to send Molly home once she seemed stable after 6 days in the hospital, but her body- in a very fragile state- was unable to handle the movement and within 6 hours of her discharge from the hospital, she was back, a resident of antepartum room three for another week and a half.
What had been on that first night a grim certainty was now, after the passage of a couple of weeks, a guarded hope tempered by uncertainty. The baby was not safe yet, and its - we did not know she was a she until she was born – survival depended, first on its ability to not be born until 24 weeks gestation age, what is referred to as the “age of viability.” At that point, the doctors can medically take action to save the baby and give her a viable chance for survival. Before this, any efforts would likely be in vain. Meanwhile, Molly’s body had to maintain enough amniotic fluid so that the baby’s lungs could properly develop the ability to function outside of the womb. Though they were the proper size, what would be uncertain until her birth was whether or not her lungs had been given enough time to develop a certain chemical which would keep the fringes of her lungs slightly opened every time she exhaled. Without this, with each breath, her lungs would be forced to work harder than they ought to completely inflate themselves and thus put strain on them. Though they could perhaps tolerate this strain for a time, more than likely it would not a very long time at all.
If the baby survived birth and could breath, there was also the chance for any number of other illnesses, malformations or handicaps. They would just have to wait and see. And so everyone’s life changed for a time. I thought it was one of the hardest things I had ever endured – coming home to an empty house, having to go to my in-laws to see my daughter and feeling as though she was less my child with each bedtime and dinner and milestone I missed, and having to drive to the hospital to see my young wife in a hospital bed. Though I know it was harder for her. The boredom and worry. Her separation from Sylvie was very hard. Molly entered the hospital for the first time at the end of the winter. She spent her birthday and Easter in the hospital. In many ways she missed two important months in Sylvie’s development, a fact she would lament for quite a long time afterwards. Because I worked during the week I could only bring Sylvie to visit on the weekend.
I know it was hardest on Sylvie. She had stayed the night with Molly’s parents only once, two weekends before Molly’s hospitalization and before this crisis began. We were celebrating our birthdays jointly by going to see a movie, staying overnight in a hotel and going out to eat. It was our last date for months. Sylvie had enjoyed her stay and we commented that it was nice that we had a chance to see how she would handle it and for her to begin to grow accustomed to staying elsewhere in case we needed another over night sitter. We did not know how soon Sylvie would again be staying with grandma and grandpa.
You could tell she became closed off a bit. She was only a year and a half old, and yet you could see the wall she had put up to protect herself. When Molly went into the hospital for the first few days I stayed with her, thinking it would be over tragically, and perhaps mercifully soon. When they had tried to send Molly home the first time, Molly’s parents brought Sylvie home shortly after we arrived. But Molly did not feel right and shortly after dinner her dad came back to get Sylvie – I put her in the car and said a tough goodbye. She just looked back at me with a concerned look on her face and it broke my heart.
After another week or so in the hospital, when the baby was at 22 weeks gestation age and still 2 weeks away from “viability,” it was decided that Molly should be sent home for the second time. She was stable enough to travel and if Molly went into premature labor at that stage it would have still been too early for the baby to survive. All that her stay in the hospital was accomplishing was to ensure that she was on strict bed-rest. So if she could stay on bed-rest at home and stay pregnant for two more weeks, then she would be readmitted and placed on monitors to wait for her body to go into labor, at which point they would not try and stop the process, and if everything went well, we could have a live baby (though, the concern for her lungs would remain up until when she was born).
It was decided that this time, Molly and Sylvie would stay at Molly’s parent’s home. This two weeks provided some relief from the strain of the hospitalization. Though Molly missed the security at the hospital of being monitored and watched over, it was good for her to be around Sylvie. And it was very good, and even fun, for Sylvie who received more attention for a longer duration, than she had perhaps received all of her life. At any given time, she was under the watchful eye of one of two grandparents, and or mother, and or father, and or aunt or uncle. When the baby was at 24 weeks gestation Molly was admitted to the hospital for, it was hoped, one last time.
On her third stay in the hospital, Molly was a resident of Antepartum room number 1. Though only two doors down from her previous room, it was slightly smaller – and was struck by afternoon shadow earlier every day than her previous room, due to its proximity to an exterior wall. The family once again fell into its routine of separated life…..
I would wake up after only a few hours sleepand go to work. Afterwards, I would drive straight home to change and then go over to my in-laws house where Sylvie was living so that I could spend time with her and eat dinner with her before going to the hospital to spend time with Molly. Other times, I would go straight to the hospital and have dinner and watch TV with Molly in her little hospital room. Then I would go home and work for a few hours on school work or coursework – I was taking two master’s classes at the time- until I passed out after midnight. It was exhausting and a bizarre existence, but it became routine. I began to know the nurses and smile and nod at the receptionist at the hospital. It was a new normal.
Most often, I would drive down Geddes road to get from Canton where we lived to the hospital. Geddes was a paved rural road with a high speed limit and twists and turns and trees and few police offices. It was a therapeutic drive, especially with the windows rolled down and angst filled music blasting from the speakers. This was my therapy. That and alcohol. When I got home at nine, ten, eleven at night I would quickly get a beer and head up to the computer to do my work. I would drink until bedtime and then go to bed. Coffee was my morning therapy. It got me up and kept me going. I had previously just brought a single mug’s worth of coffee, but I switched to bringing a thermos full of the hot steamy nectar of life to work with me and drinking it through lunch. But in the spring, as new life emerged, so too did our daughter enter life ex-utero.
I was at an evening meeting when I received the phone call. Molly just wanted to let me know that something might be happening and that I should be ready to leave at a moment’s notice. That moment came less than twenty minutes later. I was in the car and back on the old familiar route in no time. But this time the old familiar route was different – there was not the usual situation at the hospital – I would not be walking through the ante-partum hall doors after saying hello to one of the familiar faces behind the desk to walk to room AP 1 and see my hospital bed-bound wife in her usual hospital gown, watching whatever show that struck her fancy. Well, I still walked through the ante-partum hall doors – the familiar face behind the desk automatically opened the doors and following the old routine was easier than explaining the recent developments. But this time it was past AP rooms one through eight, to the left through the double doors and a quick right down the delivery room hallways, past the room where Sylvie was born, left around another corner and just a little farther to a room on the right in which Molly was still in a hospital gown, only no television show on this time, instead the feeling of anticipation as the doctor looked busy and the nurse looked busy and Mike felt in the way until he was handed a set of scrubs and then he got to feel busy until the scrubs were on and then he just had to wait again.
Molly was rolled out. I made some phone calls – in-laws, his parents – just a few quick phrases to let them know that something was happening and the promise of an update as soon as possible. Then I was down the hall sitting outside the c-section room chatting it up with a new father who recently saw his child born. He was so excited and he was excited for me. I did not explain the circumstances too him, but his excitement was contagious and I could not wait any longer. Before I went in, the other father warned me not to look at the whole “cutting open your wife’s belly thing.” He had, and he kind of regretted it. Then I was called in and I was told to sit down at the head of the operating table. There were several people in the room, all busy, except for Molly and I. Molly was lying there feeling her insides being out-sided. I was sitting there, trying not to be in anyone’s way. The anesthesiologist was chatting on her cell phone (I think it was with her teenaged child). Then they ripped Aine from Molly’s fetid womb. Seriously, it was infected and rotting away; the doctor commented on it while he was digging in. Aine was quickly whisked off to another room. I was taken out of the operating room and told to wait outside until someone fetched me to bring me to see Aine. Molly vomited. Since it was Monday, it was spaghetti she vomited up. Had it been Wednesday after lunch, it would have been cottage cheese and fruit salad. Had it been Wednesday night, Macaroni and cheese. If it had been Sunday, meat and potatoes. But it was Monday, so she spew partially digested spaghetti and garlic bread on the floor.
Meanwhile, I was brought the room where Aine was being cleaned off. She was connected to a bunch of wires and tubes and covered in a silver blanket. She was so tiny and shivering and really mad. The rest was a blur of going back and forth between Aine in the NICU and Molly in her recovery room. I do remember the next morning. Aine was in a big clear plastic baby box in a private room in the NICU. The sun was streaming in and she was wearing just a very tiny diaper and connected to a half dozen wires. Her eyes were closed and she squirmed around, but mostly slept. I was able to put my hand in the baby box and touch her tiny hands. She was in that room for a day, and was then moved out to the communal room. I was more relieved than I can describe. It was not long after that that she opened her eyes for the first time.
After Molly came home from the hospital we alternated visits to the NICU. I would go in the afternoon and she would go in the evening. Sometimes we would bring Sylvie and she would charm the nurses. Aine had been born weighing under three pounds. She had jaundice and for a time had to be put under the burger warmer lights to stimulate some chemical that would make her better. She grew. We visited her. She was put in a variety of multi-colored hats. We would hold her, feed her and change her diaper. She graduated from a ventilator, to a c-pap (a big tube that forced air into her nose) and then to a nasal canula. Aine constantly fought to remove these tubes from her nose. Eventually, she was removed from the baby box and put in a baby tray. With each passing day, I felt more relieved. Things seemed to get better every day. They moved her from the NICU to the less extreme unit across the hall. We got to know the nurses; they got to know us. Aine got a reputation for being loud and ornery. And three months after she was born, we took her home.
She still was on oxygen when we took her home, and from August through December we had a large oxygen tank in our living room. It looked like a torpedo. Oh yeah, and we didn’t sleep much. We tried. But Aine was ornery. We did sleep better than we did with Sylvie, though. With Sylvie we had to take shifts holding her. If we tried to put her down, she would scream. Eventually, we had to use the “leave her and let her weep” method. The first night she cried for hours. Eventually it worked. When Aine came home we spent many evenings falling asleep on the couch or in the recliner holding her, watching movies and shows we had borrowed from the library. But we learned our lesson and sleep trained her as soon as we could. And with each passing day, life felt more normal.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Want Ad

Emerging/ent seeking church...

Twenty somthing married Emerging/Emergent Christian seeking church. Must be sophisticated-seeker, spirit-inspired-artist and disenchanted-cradle-Christian friendly. Welcoming of questions, a little healthy dissent and active involvement in areas normally reserved for church elders (in every sense of the word elder) a must. Would prefer it resembled a family or community more than a megachurch.
Signed

churchless in suburbia

[12/9/09]

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Grow in Grace / Go and do likewise

"Grace is opposed to earning, not effort.". Dallas Willard

This quote is one of Dallas' favorite quotes. I have been slowly digesting it for a few weeks now and trying to internalize it and reconcile it with another concept that was ingrained in me many years ago: we are saved by faith alone through the grace of Jesus- we are not saved by works.

When I was younger, I was led by pop, modern Christianity to believe that the only point of grace is to forgive us of our sins when we ask for it. Taken in combination with my misunderstanding that "faith" was a matter of believing certain ideas to be true (ie. the "right" things about God, Jesus, and a myriad of sociopolitical issues) and my belief that I needed to try really hard not to sin (lest I ask forgiveness for the same thing too often and cheapen grace) resulted in a personal theology of "sin management" [citation needed :-] and what Willard calls "consumerist Christianity without discipleship."

I went to church to participate in worship, but also to get more head knowledge and clarify the head knowledge I had to make sure I had the right answers (this was before I was introduced to the idea of a healthy respect for the mysteries of God). I tried really hard not to sin (not in an attempt to earn grace, but so I wouldn't "cheapen it"). And eventually, when I was a senior in high school, I hit a wall. I realized that while I wasn't doing anything really bad, neither was I doing anything really good. This bothered me and I felt like it was a deficit in my life. But I also had the ingrained idea that we don't do good works in an effort to earn salvation (most Protestants I knew avoided good works as a general rule, just to be on the safe side). I felt like that young rich man who said to Jesus: look, I keep the commandments, I am a good boy...what now?

Jesus' answer: sell all your stuff, give the money to the poor and follow me (discipleship)! Ok, nice in theory. But how do I follow Jesus at the turn of the twenty first century? My church wasn't giving me too many specifics: believe, read the bible, pray, witness, ask forgiveness (but don't cheapen grace!), repeat. Since Jesus is not physically standing before me, how can I follow him? If I try to do the stuff he did, barring the stuff I cannot do (miracles and such), and the stuff I was already trying (scripture, prayer and witnessing) it seems like there were a lot of good works involved (helping those less fortunate, feeding the poor, etc) and a lot of talking back to hipocritical and out-of-touch religious authorities (scribes, Pharisees, etc). This seemed in direct conflict with the dual concepts I had been taught since a youngster: we are saved by grace, not works, and you must respect your elders.

Now, given my youth and the youthful inclination toward rebellion, I was all about exploring the possibility that Jesus was a little more complex than the docile, sacrificial lamb that Sunday School portrayed him as (except when he cleared the money changers out of the temple - that had always made him seem uncharacteristically edgy). So I began to re-read the Gospels for the first time as though Jesus was also my teacher (I was in college at this point). This read much differently than it had when I read it ealier in life. Before this, I had known that Jesus was saying cool stuff, but all I really needed to remember was that Jesus loved and forgave me. But as Jesus also became me teacher, I began trying to live a little bit like he did in terms of my interpersonal relationships. I have no delusions of grandeur - I do not actually think I am perfect- just ask anyone close to me. But if Jesus is my teacher, shouldn't I TRY to treat others with love and understanding, despite our differences? And still, this did not seem to me to conflict with the idea that you cannot earn Grace or salvation. However, it did not mesh either, until I read this Dallas Willard line: "Grace is opposed to earning, not effort".

Just because we are saved by grace does not mean we should go through life as passive as a lump on a log. Even the demons believe that God is God and Jesus saves (and they tremble), but to do kingdom work requires some effort. Dallas also elaborates on how Grace plays a part in this. Grace is not merely used as a sin-balm; grace also sanctifies our actions. How do you "grow in grace"? Not by sinning more to exercise God's forgiveness (Rasputin style!), but by acting out of a desire to follow Jesus everyday and to do God's will (Discipleship is, after all, an action). Then, God's grace sanctifies our actions to serve his purpose. If God works for the good of those who love him and have been called according to his purpose (and we know he does- it's in Romans somewhere) then surely that doesn't just apply to helping us work through the bad stuff in our lives. It also applies to helping our good efforts actually result in some good for the kingdom of God.

Grow in Grace!

Be disciples (and teach others to do likewise)!

Monday, February 22, 2010

Faith and Discipleship; Willard and Borg

In modern American Protestant Christianity it seems the most important factor in whether or not you are saved is if you have "faith". Faith in Jesus as your personal lord and savior, faith in God, faith that the bible is truth- the list could continue. What is meant by "faith" in this use of the word is often just a synonym for "belief". So, when a lot of Christians say they have faith, they are talking all about the things they believe. This is a big part of Willard's argument in the intro and 1st chapter of his book: that the big goal in a lot of churches today is just to initiate believers, not train disciples. And when you try to tell believers that God wants them to be disciples, they start to look at you suspiciously (what Willard describes as the "bait and switch"- see Corey's blogs below for a good synopsis of the intro and chapter 1 of "The Great Omission").

Part of this misunderstanding stems from the narrow meaning of the word faith accepted by many Christians (I can speak from experience, since that is the meaning of faith I started out with). Marcus Borg addresses this issue of the meaning of faith in his book "The Heart of Christianity" (p 27-37). He describes the four meanings of faith as understood by Christians throughout our 2000 year history. Just as love is understood to have many levels of meaning (I love my Ipod but I love my wife) the meaning of faith is best understood as a multi-layered word and an understanding of faith that includes this multifaceted meaning leads more naturally to a life of discipleship.

The meaning of faith commonly understood today is one of Assensus (Latin), or faith as belief. Borg describes this as "a propositional understanding," whereby to have faith in this sense is to "[give] one's mental assent to a proposition, as believing that a claim or statement is true." Borg points out that the importance of this meaning stems from two historical developments. First, the Protestant Reformation, during which time the splintering of the church led to differing beliefs between the denominations and the emphasis on believing the "right beliefs". And second, the birth of the Scientific Method's emphasis on observable facts during the Enlightenment, which has further led to the modern practice of Christians having to mentally assent to a set of beliefs in opposition to "scientific" facts (but I'll save the Truth/Fact blog for another time- maybe someone else can do it- hint,hint). There is nothing wrong with this understanding of faith, but it should not be taken as the sole meaning.

The second meaning Borg describes is that of fiducia: "a radical trust in God". Not "trusting in the truth of a set of statements about God," but rather by entrusting our worries in the care of God. Borg contrasts fiducia with anxiety: "we can measure our degree of faith as trust by the amount of anxiety in our lives." (he also mentions that he uses this example not to give us something else to chastise ourselves about, but because if we learn to live in this "radical trust" it can have a transformative effect that will allow us to spend our time, not worrying, but experiencing life as God meant us to [hint- think discipleship].

The third meaning of faith in God, fidelitas, means "a radical centering in God"; "faithfulness to our relationship in God"; and "loyalty, allegiance the commitment of the self at the deepest level, the commitment of the heart". Again Borg distinguishes that this does not mean "faithfulness to statements about God, whether biblical, credal, or doctrinal...." but "to the God to whom the bible and creeds and doctrines point.". And the opposite of this would be adultery or idolatry- when we center or lives on something other than God. Borg also draws a parallel between the "radical centering in God" of fidelitas with the two greatest commandments: "you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your mind and with all your strength...[and] you shall love your neighbor as yourself.". If we follow these commandments we are living faithfully.
Similarly, Willard describes disciples as those who, "intent upon becoming Christ-like and so dwelling in his "faith and practice", systematically and progressively [rearranges their] affairs to that end.". So a true life of faithfulness, centering one's life in God, is of the same meaning as being a disciple, rearranging one's life to be more Christ like and to live in his way (loving God and your neighbor).

Finally, the fourth meaning of faith is Visio, or vision: how we see reality. Borg describes three common ways of viewing life. One way is to view life as "hostile and threatening," a view which leads to fear, defensiveness, paranoia, an emphasis on self preservation and a tendency to build walls around ourselves, rather than open up to the strangers, the poor, the widows, etc. Some Christians even view God in this way if they see him as a vindictive God who is out to punish and condemn to Hell.

A second way to view reality is as "indifferent.". This is the modern secular view that you live however you want to live, doing whatever makes you happy within the bounds of societal norms... And then you die. It seems to me that the conjunction of a belief that Christianity is just belief in a few main ideas and a vision in the secular American dream has done more harm to the church in this country than homosexuality, abortion and Muslims (three of the things that seem to worry many conservatives- not to say that I condone abortion).

The third way of seeing reality, and the way that best fosters a life of faith, faithfulness, and discipleship, is to see it as "life giving and nourishing.". God is good and gracious, and life is not simply a trial we must endure before we die and go to heaven, but God wants us to live a full, enriched life "in radical trust...[free from] the anxiety, self-preoccupation and the concern to protect the self...[with] the ability to love and to be present to the moment...[generating] a 'willingness to spend and be spent' for the sake of a vision that goes beyond ourselves." (see also "waking the dead" by Eldredge).

It seems then that training disciples involves teaching a fuller understanding of faith. In hearing the verse "we are saved by our faith alone", if our understanding of faith is limited only to assensus, the "cost of discipleship" may seem, as Willard noted, more than we signed up for, or rather like a super Christianity, a premium level that you have to pay more for when in fact, most people settle for the "free trial version". But if we as the Church teach that faith means more than simply believing in X,Y and Z and that faith is a life of trust and faithfulness in God and a vision in the Kingdom of God on earth, we will be doing more to train disciples, rather than simply initiating members to our churches.

Friday, February 5, 2010

All teabaggers in the house
with the tax day pouts say:
"WE WANT TAX CUTS!" [we want tax cuts!"]-
All the crackas in Nashville
who think they shouldn't foot the bill say:
"WE WANT TAX CUTS!" [we want tax cuts!!!]

-written to commemorate this year's first gathering of the teabagger's union.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Perfection


“Be perfect as your heavenly father is perfect” Jesus
“Aim for perfection” – Paul the Apostle
“…he said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you’” – Paul the Apostle
“For if you are able to bear the entire yoke of the Lord, you will be perfect; but if you are not able, then at least do what you can” The Didache [6:2]
“Perfection never was a requirement, although some might say we desired it.” Five Iron Frenzy
Growing up a Christian in a fairly conservative Protestant church I was given mixed signals. Some Christians, despite claiming a belief in Grace, seem to expect nothing less than perfection. Perhaps I felt this pressure more as a pastor’s kid, but I think that all kids in church feel like they are under the microscope from parents and elders. Grace, grace, grace is taught and preached, but the weight of high behavioral expectations grow with your age. Some church kids rebel from the start, enjoying every sin they can. Some hold out for some time, trying to live up to the expectations and feeling guilt for every time they slip up, and all the while trying to keep up appearances. In some groups this leads to a cult of perfection. What I witnessed was the complete depletion of my age group as we moved towards high school graduation. By the time I returned from college there were very few twenty-somethings in my former church at all – and I say former because I too have left.
To some, it seems, Christianity is nothing more than behavioral control, a list of impossible rules with the promise of pie in the sky. That is what I suspect drove off many former child church goers and prevents others from giving it a try. But I know there are many who have stayed interested in their faith, and still value it. I suppose I can only speak for myself, and this is true for me. But my beliefs have stayed important to me because I have come to understand the meaning of grace. When I was a child growing up in church, I heard the word “grace” a lot. But I did not truly understand grace, or at least not nearly as well as the expectation for perfection. Because when I saw people step out of line, the reaction from adults, parents and other kids was usually not modeling grace – it was typically punishment, disapproval or judgment.
Now, I am not perfect (just ask my wife, friends, family, and co-workers) and I do not claim to be perfect (though Molly would say I act like I think I am). But I spent most of my childhood and teen years, growing up a non-rebellious church kid, feeling guilty for not being perfect. And that was despite the fact that I knew in my mind that perfection was not the requirement; that any perfection is only by grace. But as I have said, it took me a while to understand the meaning of grace…
Reading the Didache, I wonder why I did not hear more lines such as the one I quoted above when I was growing up. And even as I wrote that rhetorical question I know the answer…. If you can follow the teachings of the Lord, you will be perfect. If not, do what you can. This is not a very “bright line” rule, not an easy rule to raise children by. Instead, it is much easier to tell your kids to be perfect. For I suppose if you tell your children to try to be perfect, but if they cannot, to do what they can, then they may “do what they can” into all sorts of undesirable situations: “well, I know I shouldn’t __________, but I did what I could!”
But, it is not easy to try to follow Christ’s teachings, and I am not convinced it is supposed to be a simple matter of behaving yourself. I have only stayed a Christian because I have come to understand the meaning of grace. Had I not come to understand it, and still only believed Christianity to be a list of impossible rules with the promise of pie in the sky, I perhaps would have abandoned the faith of my childhood by now. But as it turned out, I have stuck with it. And though I am not perfect (just ask my wife, family, friends and co-workers), I do what I can.